• 3
  • 2
  • 1

Remembering the Land - Reckitt Lecture 2007

John Rodwell

This MB Reckitt Trust project, which began in 2005, had two particular starting points and aims. First, I wanted to explore the apparent deficiency in a spiritual perspective in understanding and implementing the sustainability process, and to see what engagement there might be between faith communities and the other sectors – economic, social and environmental – that are involved; and second, in the spirit of the Trust’s challenge to social structures and processes, I wanted to develop a theological critique of the notion of sustainability as we see it in operation in the UK today.

I began my research in the Dearne Valley in South Yorkshire, working with key environmental players – Yorkshire Forward, Groundwork, the Forestry Commission, Natural England and the RSPB (Only silence has greeted my several attempts to engage Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council in the work). And among the faith communities, I have been working with the Anglican, Roman Catholic and Methodist Churches. With each, I was asking the same questions through interviews with executives, discussions with staff and engagement of one sort or another with customers: what it meant to ‘secure the future’ as the UK government calls the quest for sustainability, whether there was a spiritual dimension to this task and vision, and whether some notion of ‘belonging to place’ was considered a part of a sustainable future. This work has proved rich and challenging and it continues; but I have increasingly, this past year, stood back from the particular place, to engage wider representatives of these various sectors and to see how far the conclusions from the case study are applicable more generally.

During the research, I have had a gathering sense of some serious deficiencies in the assumptions lying behind the sustainability process and the whole notion of securing the future. First, there are some very partial and impoverished understandings of ‘community’ in the Dearne Valley and how (indeed whether) this relates to ‘place’ – and how communities relate to places. Second, it has become increasingly hard for me to see how it is possible to secure a future for the Dearne Valley when there is such a deficient comprehension of its ‘past’, or pasts.

A third point is this: that, generally, the faith communities of the area are regarded by local authorities, agencies and NGOs as clients or partners in delivering a sustainable future, a role envisaged in the two national reports about their place in the process. And it is clear they can themselves connive in this, partly because they can be singularly successful in projects that help achieve desirable socio-economic goals. What is not so easy for them to articulate is any substantive theological engagement with critical deficiencies in the process itself. This lecture is therefore partly concerned to identify ways in which belief as well as practice might articulate key changes.

A full version of this lecture can be found in Crucible, October 2008.

Dissemination of results The Reckitt Lecture 2006 has been accepted as a paper for Studies in Christian Ethics in October 2008. A shorter, less academic account of the research will appear in Crucible in 2008. This year, invitations to give postgraduate seminars on the research have come from the universities of Chester, Exeter and Manchester.

Welcome to the MB Reckitt Trust

THE MB Reckitt Trust (formerly the Christendom Trust) is

  • a UK registered charity (No. 262394)
  • a grant-giving trust that funds projects concerned with Christian social thought and action
  • an organization that takes initiatives and holds consultations on topics of Christian and social concern.

The aim of the Trust is to promote researches and activities that evaluate and develop social structures, processes and attitudes in order to release energies for change, from the perspective of Christianity.

Trustees are currently wanting to encourage work that supports the following outcome:

Being and building communities that are diverse and cohesive, in order to bring about a stronger society

Within this theme the Trust will prioritize applications focused on:

  1. Constructive communication and understanding between Christianity and the other principal faith traditions;
  2. People of faith engaging in social and political issues;
  3. Shared social action in plural settings;

The Trust will continue to focus its support on thoughtful/qualitative action research that can release energies for change, i.e. producing application and understanding that goes beyond the people or the project involved.

Since its funds are small, the Trust does not fund core activities, nor buildings, bursaries, but seeks to support work that has an element of research and innovation, with the likelihood of wider dissemination, replication or policy change.

With increasing competition for scarcer funds, the Trustees' strategy is to support work where their funding will make the largest difference. Grants rarely fall outside the £500-£10,000 range. The total number of grants will therefore be few, and predominantly awarded within the UK and Ireland. Grants may be given in association with other charities, if this is a means of achieving the Trust’s aims. The Trust prefers not to collaborate in quasi-governmental action research.

Applications for Funding

PLEASE NOTE! Due to the Coronavirus emergency, the Trustees will not be allocating grants in 2020.

As soon as the situation is clearer, we will post future plans here.

We apologise sincerely to all potential applicants, and wish them, and all current beneficiaries, well in these difficult times.

Trust Accounts

The latest published accounts for the trust can be viewed here.